Visuddhimagga XIV-215

Ettha ca yathā vedanādayo anāsavāpi atthi, na evaṃ rūpaṃ.

在此经中：受等是有无漏的，而色是没有无漏的。

Ñ(XIV,215): Now while there is feeling, etc., both free from cankers [and subject to them], not so materiality.

Yasmā panassa rāsaṭṭhena khandhabhāvo yujjati, tasmā khandhesu vuttaṃ.

然而此色由于聚的意义，是适合于蕴的意义，故说为蕴；

Ñ: However, since materiality can be described as a [simple] aggregate in the sense of a total, it is therefore mentioned among the [simple] aggregates.

Yasmā rāsaṭṭhena ca sāsavaṭṭhena ca upādānakkhandhabhāvo yujjati, tasmā upādānakkhandhesu vuttaṃ.

此色由于聚义及有漏之义，则适合于取蕴，故说为取蕴。

Ñ: And since it can be described as an aggregate [that is the object] of clinging in the sense of a total and in the sense of being subjected to cankers, that [same materiality] is therefore mentioned among the aggregates [as objects] of clinging too.

Vedanādayo pana anāsavāva khandhesu vuttā.

可是受等在蕴中说是无漏的，

Ñ: But feeling, etc., are only mentioned among the [simple] aggregates when they are free from cankers.

Sāsavā upādānakkhandhesu.

在取蕴中说是有漏的。

Ñ: When they are subject to cankers, they are mentioned among the aggregates [as objects] of clinging.

Upādānakkhandhāti cettha upādānagocarā khandhā upādānakkhandhāti evamattho daṭṭhabbo. Idha pana sabbepete ekajjhaṃ katvā khandhāti adhippetā.

在这里的取蕴，当知是「取着之境的蕴为取蕴」的意义。然而在这里（清净道论）是把此等（蕴、取蕴）一切总括一起而单说为蕴的。

Ñ: And here the meaning of the term 'aggregates as objects of clinging' should be regarded as this: aggregates that are the resort of clinging are aggregates of clinging. But here all these taken together are intended as aggregates.