Lakkhaṇaṃ panettha saddasatthato pariyesitabbaṃ.
而此（缘起的语）相则应于文法中求之。
Ñ(XVII,8): The characteristic must be sought from grammar.
574. Keci pana paṭicca sammā ca titthiyaparikappitapakatipurisādikāraṇanirapekkho uppādo paṭiccasamuppādoti evaṃ uppādamattaṃ paṭiccasamuppādoti vadanti, taṃ na yujjati.
有人不顾外道（数论）所遍计的自性、神我等的原因，却说缘正生起为缘起，如是只以生起为缘起。[PTS 519] 他这种说法是不恰当的！
Ñ: Some, in fact, [say that the expression paṭicca samuppāda (dependent origination) is characterized thus:] 'having depended (paṭicca), a right (sammā) arising (uppāda), [depending on causes rightly by] disregarding such causes conjectured by sectarians as the Primordial Essence (Prakriti), World Soul (Purusha), and so on'. So what they call dependent origination (paṭicca samuppāda) is a simple arising (uppāda) [for they equate the prefix saṃ only with sammā (rightly) and ignore saṃ (with, con-)]. That is untenable. [519]
-
Chew: What is “Primordial Essence (Prakriti) '所遍计的自性'”?
Kasmā?
何以故？
Ñ: Why?
Suttābhāvato, suttavirodhato, gambhīranayāsambhavato, saddabhedato ca.
（1）无有经说故，（2）与经相违故，（3）缺乏甚深之理故，（4）破坏语法故。
Ñ: (1) There is no such sutta; (2) it contradicts suttas; (3) it admits of no profound treatment; and (4) it is ungrammatical.
No comments:
Post a Comment